<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Business Geek - Comments</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/</link>
    <description>Business Geek - Finding a way to improve the corporation</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:35:07 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Simon: Specialisation vs generalisation</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/63-Specialisation-vs-generalisation.html#c655</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/63-Specialisation-vs-generalisation.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=63</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    There is also a &quot;human nature&quot; aspect to specialisation. Whenever I see a company get really specialised, they then trend to wanting to cover a broader segment of the market. Conversely, companies that have wide spread of offerings often start to divest themselves of offerings (and then go back again a few years later). I think this is part of a broader human foible of &quot;if I am doing A, I probably should be doing B&quot; and vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specialisation also has strategic ramifications when your specialisation depends on the specialisations of others that may cease to be available. The pre WWI world was a good example of on where certain countries were the only ones that manufactured certain goods. Once hostilities broke out - there were dramatic shortages as the means of supply were cut and alternatives were unavailable. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:59:03 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/63-guid.html#c655</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Twitter - 144 characters but little money</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/61-Twitter-144-characters-but-little-money.html#c652</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/61-Twitter-144-characters-but-little-money.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=61</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Twitter is just and echo chamber for the next generation of &quot;dot bombers&quot; in San Fran. Then again, when the big one comes, there won&#039;t be whole lot of twittering going on as it all slides into the sea! &lt;img src=&quot;http://businessgeek.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png&quot; alt=&quot;;-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 03:18:42 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/61-guid.html#c652</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: The power of &quot;No&quot;</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/60-The-power-of-No.html#c650</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/60-The-power-of-No.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    This is tough issue in the &quot;go go noughties&quot;. But I think the key is not just saying no - but helping to find someone else to do the job (or pushing it back to the person who SHOULD be doing it).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now...BACK TO WORK!!! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:20:25 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/60-guid.html#c650</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Statistical (un)reality part 1</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/59-Statistical-unreality-part-1.html#c649</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/59-Statistical-unreality-part-1.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=59</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I think the other issue with statistics is that 75% of them are made up on the spot!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously though - the GURU when it comes to the use of visuals to display information (and to obfuscate it) is Edward Tufte http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His works are simply incredible! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:34:05 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/59-guid.html#c649</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Personal economic responsibility</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/57-Personal-economic-responsibility.html#c648</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/57-Personal-economic-responsibility.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=57</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The wonders of human nature, coupled with the ever-sophisticated engines of marketing and advertising and you have a world of suckers bent on mass-consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;Buy now - nothing to pay for 5 years&quot;!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or people who complain they cannot find a house to buy affordably and then say &quot;Well, it needs 3 bedrooms, a study, two bathrooms, a media room and a 3 car garage - oh and I want it 5 kms from the CBD&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you spend 10% less than you earn - you will always be rich! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:08:11 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/57-guid.html#c648</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: The value of an inclusive executive</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/58-The-value-of-an-inclusive-executive.html#c647</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/58-The-value-of-an-inclusive-executive.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=58</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I would have two key comments to this issue. Firstly, in terms of Executives - I think their situation proves &quot;it is good to be the king!&quot;. If you do well - you do well, if you fail - you do well!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other aspect is that Motorola has been &quot;processed&quot; out of the market. I remember a number of years ago when the Capability Maturity Model was the &quot;six sigma&quot; de jour, Motorola was always held up as a poster child. &quot;oh, they have CMM level 5!!!&quot;. Well, that just about squeezed out all the creativity, flexibility and serendipity from the design process, and leaves Motorola the most &quot;uncool&quot; of brands... 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:03:17 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/58-guid.html#c647</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Not a definitive win for Blu Ray</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/56-Not-a-definitive-win-for-Blu-Ray.html#c646</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/56-Not-a-definitive-win-for-Blu-Ray.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=56</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Never has a format war been so &quot;meh&quot;. Video tape gave us something we did not have before. DVD made it digital and of higher quality with Random Access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blu Ray has none of these key &quot;kickers&quot;. More lines does not cut it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will cheerfully buy my Blu Ray player when I can buy it from the local electronics shop for $60. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:07:22 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/56-guid.html#c646</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Will the prisoners dilemma kill Facebook?</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/55-Will-the-prisoners-dilemma-kill-Facebook.html#c645</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/55-Will-the-prisoners-dilemma-kill-Facebook.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=55</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I think that facebook and other social networks take the saying &quot;Hell is other people&quot; to a whole new level! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:35:32 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/55-guid.html#c645</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Moving towards the semantic web</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/54-Moving-towards-the-semantic-web.html#c644</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/54-Moving-towards-the-semantic-web.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=54</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    In short - it ain&#039;t going to happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humans are more adaptable than machines - so we need to leverage our own adaptability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best example I have seen is that for years people tried to do &quot;palm-like&quot; devices that would recognise handwriting. It never worked and always consumed vast amounts of processing power for a poor result. The Palm Graffiti model changed all that - have the device understand a defined set of gestures and have the human learn the language. This simple shift in processing focus changed the way you would use and design these devices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until we develop computers with human-like processing ability - the semantic web will not happen. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:03:53 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/54-guid.html#c644</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Managing an online identity</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/53-Managing-an-online-identity.html#c643</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/53-Managing-an-online-identity.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=53</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The worst thing about people revealing &quot;cross purpose&quot; information is that it lives on the net forever! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:48:32 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/53-guid.html#c643</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: The Music industry appears to see sense! [update - ..then snaps out of it]</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/52-The-Music-industry-appears-to-see-sense!-update-..then-snaps-out-of-it.html#c642</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/52-The-Music-industry-appears-to-see-sense!-update-..then-snaps-out-of-it.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=52</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Didn&#039;t happen and won&#039;t happen. Why? Because of the lawyers and accountants in the RI - they run the show. You can make numbers say anything, and lawyers are loathe to give away rights to ANYTHING. So that is that - done, over - just hype. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:03:12 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/52-guid.html#c642</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Apple stocks back to reality</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/50-Apple-stocks-back-to-reality.html#c641</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/50-Apple-stocks-back-to-reality.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=50</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    It must be hard being right all the time &#039;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the real &quot;hit&quot; was when the release the &quot;air&quot; and people said &quot;looks great - but is a crap laptop&quot;. This kind of translates to Apple as a stock - looked great on the outside, but the fundamentals are just not there to justify the price!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Apple going off the rails? I wonder. I give them 12 months for another &quot;smash&quot; product or they are going to start down the slippery slope during the US recession.... 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:31:06 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/50-guid.html#c641</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: LG V Quanta is a big deal for two reasons</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/49-LG-V-Quanta-is-a-big-deal-for-two-reasons.html#c640</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/49-LG-V-Quanta-is-a-big-deal-for-two-reasons.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=49</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The whole world of patent law is murky at best and supremely corrupt at worst. I think the only viable option at this stage is to set up a company called &quot;troll-u-like&quot; and feast on the bloated carcass that is IP law in the technological age! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:22:11 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/49-guid.html#c640</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: Artificial barriers cause real business loss</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/48-Artificial-barriers-cause-real-business-loss.html#c639</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/48-Artificial-barriers-cause-real-business-loss.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=48</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    You are spot on! How crazy is it for companies to impose arcane geographical boundaries on a medium that is revolutionary because it transcends those boundaries!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again we have a company STOPPING a customer from GIVING them money!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How does this &quot;add to shareholder value&quot; again? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:09:20 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/48-guid.html#c639</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Simon: $600 Apple share price: Beyond irrational exuberance</title>
    <link>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/47-600-Apple-share-price-Beyond-irrational-exuberance.html#c638</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/47-600-Apple-share-price-Beyond-irrational-exuberance.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://businessgeek.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=47</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Simon)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I think an interesting study would be the correlation between inflated stock projections and sales of illicit substances to those making those projections! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:05:23 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessgeek.org/index.php?/archives/47-guid.html#c638</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>